From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 2 10:01:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0611E106564A for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 10:01:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller23@insightbb.com) Received: from mail.insightbb.com (smtp3.insight.synacor.com [208.47.185.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA598FC15 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 10:01:17 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=23jd6d0TMshKZg6MPjgxXM8Eanz+y4KLUxg3jSpzfIM= c=1 sm=0 a=9fOwHjcT9nYA:10 a=jLN7EqiLvroA:10 a=eFFBxs06v1YKuUJtkFcA:9 a=AcdsImxJPJ9Yo6Ye3TGm+Q==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.insight.synacor.com smtp.mail=mueller23@insightbb.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: smtp01.insight.synacor.com header.from=mueller23@insightbb.com; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (smtp01.insight.synacor.com: transitional domain insightbb.com does not designate 74.134.34.76 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.134.34.76] ([74.134.34.76:58360] helo=localhost) by mail.insightbb.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.40 r(29895/29896)) with ESMTP id 11/02-17648-C6BBA605; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 06:01:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 06:01:16 -0400 Message-ID: <11.02.17648.C6BBA605@smtp01.insight.synacor.com> From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: problem cross-compiling 9.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 10:01:19 -0000 > when using an amd64 host to 'make buildworld' it seems that > it's using the wrong cpp, at least when building ioctl.c via mkioctl in > usr.bin/ktrace and having set WITHOUT_CPP(*). This used to work with > previous releases. > *: Im compiling for an embedded system, and hence I want the minimum stuff. > at the moment the work around is to remove the WITHOUT_CPP, but it got me > worried. > any fix? > cheers, > danny You don't say what target architecture you are cross-compiling for, and if your host OS was FreeBSD or something else like Linux or NetBSD. I've been cross-compiling NetBSD 5.1_STABLE, 6.0 prerelease and HEAD for i386 and amd64 from FreeBSD 9.0_STABLE with varied results, but in my experience NetBSD is less stable and less up-to-date than FreeBSD. Tom