Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 09:20:34 +0200 From: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> To: Gleb Popov <6yearold@gmail.com> Cc: Tobias Berner <tcberner@gmail.com>, FreeBSD ports list <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: deskutils/owncloudclient dumps core Message-ID: <555C35C2.2090003@madpilot.net> In-Reply-To: <CALH631nsb5_x5x=DHa29sipJ1Rg0_6aSU9EutBUzpoeP2=attQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20150519133109.1e15b2a6@efreet> <555B2D52.2040404@FreeBSD.org> <1845444.67ldOPtrld@tl12> <555BB837.6010806@FreeBSD.org> <555BBC3A.1060406@madpilot.net> <CALH631nsb5_x5x=DHa29sipJ1Rg0_6aSU9EutBUzpoeP2=attQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/20/15 09:04, Gleb Popov wrote: > > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net > <mailto:mad@madpilot.net>> wrote: > > On 05/20/15 00:24, Guido Falsi wrote: > > On 05/19/15 14:50, Tobias Berner wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> > >> > >> The problem imho is, that it mixes qt4 and qt5. > >> > >> Easiest work around is just to build the qt5 gui -- that's what > >> > >> I've been doing for a year now. > >> > >> > > > > How do you compile against qt5? > > > > At present the security/qtkeychain port is quite updated and inadequate. > > It's impossible at present to have it installed for both qt4 and qt5. > > > > Now that I've looked at it I suspect that's the real cause of problems > > and what makes qt5 symbols get mixed in. If qt is present qtkeychain > > will happily pick up that one. > > > > This would also explain why the bug does not show up in poudriere built > > ports. > > A quick test on my machine which showed the problem exposed that the > cause of the problem is really in qtkeychain. > > I'll perform a quick fix for that, to avoid the core dump. A better > solution (both ports able to build both on qt4 and qt5) will require > some more time. > > > I've created a PR to update both owncloudclient and qtkeychain to their > recent versions, but it's stalled for a month: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198785 I did not see it. The patch is a little stale though. I'll take the PR but could you update the patch with one against the present state of the tree? -- Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?555C35C2.2090003>