From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 16 14:21:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E8D16A4CE; Mon, 16 May 2005 14:21:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sakura.ninth-nine.com (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5498043D81; Mon, 16 May 2005 14:21:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from nadesico.ninth-nine.com (nadesico.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.122]) by sakura.ninth-nine.com (8.13.3/8.13.1/NinthNine) with SMTP id j4GEL5nL004762; Mon, 16 May 2005 23:21:05 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 23:21:05 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200505161421.j4GEL5nL004762@sakura.ninth-nine.com> From: Norikatsu Shigemura To: yongari@rndsoft.co.kr In-Reply-To: <20050516020216.GA1020@rndsoft.co.kr> References: <20050509075416.GD915@rndsoft.co.kr> <200505141700.j4EH0bQW030441@sakura.ninth-nine.com> <20050516020216.GA1020@rndsoft.co.kr> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.10 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.121]); Mon, 16 May 2005 23:21:05 +0900 (JST) cc: freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.org cc: scottl@FreeBSD.org cc: nork@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [ >K82-=:FT79:'(HIGH) ] Re: maestro3 mpsafe patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 14:21:13 -0000 On Mon, 16 May 2005 11:02:16 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > So I confirmed yongari's patch for mpsafe maestro3(4) > > with playing xmms or mplayer, But I don't know effectiveness > > of it. Becuase I didn't contact a panic after and before > > applying it. > Thanks for your report. This is the one I like to hear. > (it didn't break :)) :-). > Can you compare system loads with/without the patch? > For example, extracting large size tarred file(e.g. mozilla) while > playing audio samples or playing multiple channels simultaneously. Ah! Yes, I felt that the noise decreased with the patch. That's too COOL!!