From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 21:58:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8194C37B401 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 21:58:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from calis.blacksun.org (calis.blacksun.org [216.254.108.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3EF43F3F for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 21:58:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from don@calis.blacksun.org) Received: by calis.blacksun.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2298217058; Fri, 9 May 2003 01:03:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by calis.blacksun.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E40617054; Fri, 9 May 2003 01:03:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 01:03:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Don To: Terry Lambert In-Reply-To: <3EBB3275.CB107353@mindspring.com> Message-ID: <20030509010252.V73271@calis.blacksun.org> References: <20030508142234.GA1359@laptop.6bone.nl> <3908.1052404777@critter.freebsd.dk> <20030508174923.F79286@daneel.foundation.hs> <3EBB3275.CB107353@mindspring.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Heiko Schaefer Subject: Re: data corruption with current (maybe sis chipset related?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 04:58:23 -0000 > it's not really appropriate to -current any more. Bosko's is > preferred, because it doesn't disclose the nature of the bug, How, exactly, is this preferred? :) -Don