From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Mar 2 16:34:11 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FEF8F3266F for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 16:34:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garga.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 451446A58E; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 16:34:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garga.bsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id y137so12631783qka.4; Fri, 02 Mar 2018 08:34:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uvIxkRCRuoJs+TAAAJzcatmCN4eKrCCjz8HKj690Big=; b=X1pv6eFHL7bf7IZaFx879dvvF2YqZLAnlSqBMx4S50eZDxsCbm51DnNkOegwJhEjiB a0ggoJqGindd+y37zi9LcYtOh3N2fL/nICi7Gx1/iet47ZM5r1qp4SKZpJVieyAJLIuu lRiChytQxAD1FRHP8FuZ2GGXDYKfi5OBP736G3yPP2x84LPIFkWYoEvXqDE0PcXgNIu1 QHJoK3S6JIHhKga98yq0fIy1yxE9xXZ59r2Mn5Jk90eWCsW+k5ed+GRfAv9xvL+250z7 koCAM6ZDwlqa0IQWDxkNPutN2EB99H+G1ooeLJBAJJ+hFPidfEPYo8acLF66NfalN2nU +QOw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uvIxkRCRuoJs+TAAAJzcatmCN4eKrCCjz8HKj690Big=; b=T+QzPyboTDon0NjkI/k4btPm7I8nlr2c5yYHP7GX+XK2WXealXDd0Slp5I8re0Zi2L URynZTqvvMlIiEOoC3IEow2BL8TZMnYhz5DZ0JkSqR0FYxp8VJTluZUWcK+wDoYOVjeY 5bRfS6x71zxdYflPU8vfOZW3JqGSjEvbVWDBpK/Ext8GJapjZ3PbGt1Cz9CTDN0Zofi5 mMA4JGqOXG6uydsC+Y6616wbvZaO4AFN186Fd+lCrX/p5mN1Pmj4G9PIfsmfw6h+2qS/ J3TXtzxpQrcw/pQ6C8VvNgRzc0a3Pw4/NC6JipiK+m/rejvpz138V1MEanH8lx87LCnD Rezg== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FB0x4LD2EzwmgmcBkmf77crog7x2DsyypKnHSWQcbpp+0PBv/F FTpaSxXsLj2iWCcROSKlxtdqYX4P X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvu2P8sImoSCFgXZ1K1g+8igkRee2Gbw7NVXT00Xguu637IKXwDV5x465yQu3GeempEBRQqUg== X-Received: by 10.55.6.10 with SMTP id 10mr9179292qkg.191.1520008450427; Fri, 02 Mar 2018 08:34:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mbp.home ([177.53.86.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c42sm4870520qtc.42.2018.03.02.08.34.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Mar 2018 08:34:09 -0800 (PST) Sender: Renato Botelho Subject: Re: Question mark on Lua menu box To: Kyle Evans Cc: FreeBSD Current , Ed Maste References: <86a6a648-be6a-41b8-7cee-c78cc72a894f@FreeBSD.org> From: Renato Botelho Message-ID: <1577158e-59ad-6882-7328-a6c572af4b6b@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 13:34:07 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 16:34:11 -0000 On 02/03/18 12:55, Kyle Evans wrote: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Renato Botelho wrote: >> On 02/03/18 12:31, Kyle Evans wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Renato Botelho wrote: >>>> Kyle, >>>> >>>> I've moved to Lua loader to help testing and it worked fine. The only >>>> odd thing I noted is the menu box with odd chars as you can see at [1]. >>>> >>>> My laptop is running a recent current (r330275) with ZFS and UEFI. >>>> >>>> [1] https://imgur.com/a/kIQ0O >>>> -- >>>> Renato Botelho >>>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Thanks for testing! =) Can you give it a shot with EFI boot after >>> r330281 (just committed), please? >>> >>> I think our working theory is that we were printing newlines along >>> with our box-drawing characters, and that could be problematic. The >>> new version handles all of that a little better and respects >>> loader_menu_frame to boot. >> >> Hi, >> >> Unfortunately it didn't change anything. >> > > Aw =(. Can you take a picture of what Forth loader looks like for you > with the default frame style on an EFI boot? I'm wondering if it's not > doing something sneaky that I can't determine from the things I've > looked at. Sure, here it is: https://imgur.com/a/fmO8w -- Renato Botelho