From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 18:13:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC53516A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:13:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7923643D2C for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:13:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1098) id 6DBB32ED476; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:13:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:13:52 -0800 From: Bill Fumerola To: eqe@cox.net Message-ID: <20031211021352.GK91301@elvis.mu.org> References: <200312092243.02269.eqe@cox.net> <200312102037.42947.eqe@cox.net> <1071107664.16605.10.camel@desolation.livid.de> <200312102110.42109.eqe@cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200312102110.42109.eqe@cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.8-MUORG-20030806 i386 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why support alpha?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: billf@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 02:13:53 -0000 On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 09:10:42PM -0500, eqe@cox.net wrote: > ok, and by saying the things you have said here you are doing something > productive? I only made a suggestion nothing more nothing less why you take > this so personally is beyond me but now I am done w/ this I have wasted > enough time trying to explain myself to a narrow minded fool such as > yourself. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/eresources.html#ERESOURCES-MAIL Personal attacks and profanity (in the context of an argument) are not allowed, and that includes users and developers alike. Gross breaches of netiquette, like excerpting or reposting private mail when permission to do so was not and would not be forthcoming, are frowned upon but not specifically enforced. However, there are also very few cases where such content would fit within the charter of a list and it would therefore probably rate a warning (or ban) on that basis alone. consider yourself warned. -- - bill fumerola / fumerola@yahoo-inc.com / billf@FreeBSD.org