From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 14 08:09:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD04F16A403 for ; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 08:09:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from harald@clef.at) Received: from stud3.tuwien.ac.at (stud3.tuwien.ac.at [193.170.75.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93C743D49 for ; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 08:09:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from harald@clef.at) Received: from bluedaemon.clef.test (v209-200.vps.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.209.200]) by stud3.tuwien.ac.at (8.9.3 (PHNE_29774)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA22669 for ; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:09:32 +0200 (METDST) To: freebsd security References: <20061010185141.ce3e7134.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <452C25A2.6080809@freebsd.org> From: Harald Muehlboeck Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:12:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <452C25A2.6080809@freebsd.org> (Colin Percival's message of "Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:58:42 -0700") Message-ID: <86odsfmi3o.fsf@tuha.clef.at> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 11:43:24 +0000 Subject: Re: iDefense Security Advisory 10.10.06: FreeBSD ptrace PT_LWPINFO Denial of Service Vulnerability X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 08:09:39 -0000 Colin Percival writes: >> "The policy of the FreeBSD Security Team is that local denial of service >> bugs not be treated as security issues; it is possible that this problem >> will be corrected in a future Erratum." > > If there was any potential for > (a) privilege escalation, > (b) disclosure of potentially sensitive information, or > (c) denial of service by a non-authenticated attacker, > we would have issued a security advisory. I am missing this information on . The site does not say wich bugs are treated as security issue and which are not. Perhaps these three points above can be added to the website.