Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 09:08:35 -0600 From: Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> To: Antoine Brodin <antoine@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers <ports-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Ports Management Team <portmgr@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r565350 - in head: . lang lang/tauthon www www/palemoon Message-ID: <CACNAnaFrx883B007%2BV6=afOsuit3ZzHuav7V%2Bs%2BsY_=T8TYjXQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <202102152253.11FMrUs9099715@repo.freebsd.org> References: <202102152253.11FMrUs9099715@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 4:53 PM Antoine Brodin <antoine@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Author: antoine > Date: Mon Feb 15 22:53:29 2021 > New Revision: 565350 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/565350 > > Log: > Remove some ports that were created despite the expirations in place > > Deleted: > head/lang/tauthon/ > head/www/palemoon/ > Modified: > head/MOVED > head/lang/Makefile > head/www/Makefile > Hi, Please help me understand what just happened here, because this makes approximately zero sense to me. Why is tauthon considered expired? If it's maintained, independently useful and demonstrably functional for something (an example of which you removed along with it), then why are we aggressively removing it based on "expirations" that are nonexistent? Thanks, Kyle Evans
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACNAnaFrx883B007%2BV6=afOsuit3ZzHuav7V%2Bs%2BsY_=T8TYjXQ>