From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Feb 5 05:00:04 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA13156 for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 05:00:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA13145; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 05:00:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 05:00:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199702051300.FAA13145@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs Cc: From: Dmitrij Tejblum Subject: Re: bin/2657: ypserv thinks there is no computers in network 10.1.2.3 netmask 255.255.255.0 Reply-To: Dmitrij Tejblum Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The following reply was made to PR bin/2657; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dmitrij Tejblum To: Bill Fenner Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/2657: ypserv thinks there is no computers in network 10.1.2.3 netmask 255.255.255.0 Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 15:13:55 +0300 (MSK) On Tue, 4 Feb 1997, Bill Fenner wrote: > ypserv is right. Network numbers are normally specified with a "0" in the > host portion; in your case, the network number is 10.1.2.0 . 10.1.2.3 is > a host address on the network 10.1.2.0 . Your patch simply allows people > to specify either a host address or the network number in the securenets > file. > > Bill > Yes, I know. This PR is "change-request". But I spent few hours before understood it. (Yes, I was stupid.) May be, ypserv should print warning about such wrong config? But it is more than 1 my line... And, after all, why my securenets file must differ from my ifconfig commands? Dima