From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 26 11:57:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C496116A4CE for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:57:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5113843D2F for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:57:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i1QJvakj081401; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:57:36 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:57:19 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20040226.125719.01017771.imp@bsdimp.com> To: des@des.no From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: References: <20040226.115049.97364862.imp@bsdimp.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: per-device sysctls X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:57:39 -0000 In message: des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) writes: : "M. Warner Losh" writes: : > des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) writes: : > : It should be a simple matter to reimplement devinfo(8) to use the= dev : > : sysctl tree. Does anything else than devinfo(8) use devinfo(3)? : > I don't think that anything else does use it. However, devctl is : > closely related and is used by devd. : = : I don't see any reason to modify or remove devctl.... I don't see any reason to have two almost similar things in the tree when one will do. Warner