From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jan 28 01:27:36 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA02479 for current-outgoing; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 01:27:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from ravenock.cybercity.dk (ravenock.cybercity.dk [194.16.57.32]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA02472 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 01:27:31 -0800 (PST) Received: (from sos@localhost) by ravenock.cybercity.dk (8.8.4/8.7.3) id KAA17119; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 10:28:58 +0100 (MET) From: Søren Schmidt Message-Id: <199701280928.KAA17119@ravenock.cybercity.dk> Subject: Re: DX 2/50 as i286... In-Reply-To: from Philippe Regnauld at "Jan 28, 97 09:54:24 am" To: regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk (Philippe Regnauld) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 10:28:57 +0100 (MET) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL30 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In reply to Philippe Regnauld who wrote: > More on this -- defining I386_CPU as well as I486_CPU doesn't help. > The kernel still panics on boot with a i286 probe ! > > Strangely, the I486_CPU only kernel of the machine I'm using now > works fine on the 2/50 (??). The only differences I see in the kernels are: I think you have your source screwed up somehow.. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Søren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org) FreeBSD Core Team Even more code to hack -- will it ever end ..