Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 29 Sep 2007 21:03:18 -0700
From:      "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>
To:        "Ben Kaduk" <minimarmot@gmail.com>
Cc:        cvs-src@freebsd.org, Jeff Roberson <jeff@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Garance A Drosehn <gad@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern sched_ule.c 
Message-ID:  <20070930040318.094E345018@ptavv.es.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 29 Sep 2007 23:25:08 EDT." <47d0403c0709292025o430e000dl6ccb20b417858db@mail.gmail.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_1191124998_93909P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 23:25:08 -0400
> From: "Ben Kaduk" <minimarmot@gmail.com>
> Sender: owner-cvs-all@freebsd.org
> 
> On 9/29/07, Garance A Drosehn <gad@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > At 4:39 PM +0000 9/27/07, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> > >
> > >   Modified files:
> > >     sys/kern             sched_ule.c
> > >   Log:
> > >    - ...
> > >    - Assert that we're not trying to compile ULE on an unsupported
> > >      architecture.  To date, I believe only i386 and amd64 have
> > >      implemented the third cpu switch argument required.
> > >
> > >   Approved by:    re
> >
> > Does this mean that I should not switch to ULE on my single-CPU PowerPC
> > mini-Mac?
> >
> 
> I was under the impression that BSD is preferred to ULE for single-processor
> systems, irregardless of the processor architecture.

YMMV, but ULE seems to generally work better then 4BSD for interactive
uniprocessor systems. The preferred scheduler for uniprocessor servers
is less clear, but many test have shown ULE does better for those
systems in the majority of cases.

While I believe the plan is that 4BSD be in GENERIC in 7.0, but I
suspect ULE (which may still need optimizing to do in a few areas) will
soon be the standard scheduler for all 386 and amd64 systems. 

Jeff has done quite a job on ULE.
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman@es.net			Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4  EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751

--==_Exmh_1191124998_93909P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 06/03/2002

iD8DBQFG/yAFkn3rs5h7N1ERAtN4AKCoY0ciJzdIBpnfCwTGchHXKXt8LACfal1M
QjQ+2bx8trCVr8G/UgqEKo0=
=txQv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_1191124998_93909P--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070930040318.094E345018>