Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:43:09 +0200 From: Dick Hoogendijk <dick@nagual.nl> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS(2, 3 ?) vs ZFS. Message-ID: <x7k5u5dk4i.fsf@nagual.nl> In-Reply-To: <20070615214849.F63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> (Wojciech Puchar's message of "Fri\, 15 Jun 2007 21\:49\:14 %2B0200 \(CEST\)") References: <20070615165131.GC51206@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20070615183413.GA9693@rot13.obsecurity.org> <37f72b1f0706151225s53c8c2f1k17d00c9c6f96004d@mail.gmail.com> <20070615214849.F63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> writes: >>> UFS and future derivatives are here to stay. > > if ZFS will really be so nice i will be making small (50MB) > partition for /boot files, ZFS on rest. http://blogs.sun.com/ontherecord/entry/now_available_three_new_solaris I know it is a sun site. Don't intend to attack fbsd. But the topic is ZFS and that will become available in many systems, I'm sure! -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ http://nagual.nl/ + Solaris 11 05/07 ++
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?x7k5u5dk4i.fsf>