Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 22:02:43 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, David Xu <bsddiy@21cn.com> Subject: Re: vm balance Message-ID: <27001.987537763@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 17 Apr 2001 12:58:38 PDT." <20010417125838.J976@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010417125838.J976@fw.wintelcom.net>, Alfred Perlstein writes: >I thought vnodes were in stable storage? They are, that's the point Matt is not seeing yet. >Note that I really don't care for using stable storeage as a hack >to deal with this sort of thing. Well, I have to admit that it is a pretty smart way of dealing with it for remote operations, but the trouble is that it prevents us from ever lowering their number again. If Matt can device a smart way to loose the soft reference in nfs, vnodes can be a truly dynamic thing. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?27001.987537763>