From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 26 17:36:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D5A106564A for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732718FC08 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qx0Ko-0003Ca-Mx for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:36:50 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:36:50 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:36:50 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:36:37 +0200 Lines: 9 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Thunderbird/3.1.6 X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: Large machine test ideas X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:36:52 -0000 I'll have a 8x8x2 (128 logical CPUs) machine to test for an afternoon next week and I'm just wondering if any of you have something they want tested. The opportunities are limited: it would have to be a self-contained test (no network, drives, etc.) and fairly short. Of course, I'll do some of my own tests just to get a feel of the machine. I think that I'll need a 9-CURRENT snapshot on it to run all 128 CPUs, right?