From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 6 10:41:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C8816A4CE; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 10:41:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E5843D54; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 10:41:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sw@gegenunendlich.de) Received: from [212.227.126.209] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Bt29w-0001eK-00; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 12:41:12 +0200 Received: from [80.142.203.154] (helo=kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void) (TLSv1:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Bt29v-0006bv-00; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 12:41:11 +0200 Received: by kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 2D3473C20; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 12:41:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 12:41:08 +0200 From: Stefan Walter To: Volker Stolz Message-ID: <20040806104108.GA10460@kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void> References: <200408051231.i75CVbxG074422@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200408051231.i75CVbxG074422@freefall.freebsd.org> Organization: Infinity Approximation Task Force X-PGP-key: http://www.gegenunendlich.de/swalter-rsa.asc X-PGP-fingerprint: 85D8 6A49 22C7 6CD9 B011 5D6A 5691 111B 12B9 E0B3 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:bea306e5fe0930b42d4355ca01786db1 cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org cc: Thomas Gellekum cc: sw@gegenunendlich.de Subject: Re: ports/70020: [MAINTAINER] games/gnocatan: update to 0.8.1.30 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 10:41:13 -0000 [Cc'd Thomas Gellekum, who happened to also send patches for the update yesterday.] Volker Stolz, 05.08.04, 14:31h CEST: > Does not build on -STABLE. This looks like a GCC 2 vs. 3 issue. Usually, > the required patches are very small and can be generated by hand in a jiffy Hm...I looked at the code, but I don't see what the cause of this could be. My knowledge about the differences between gcc 2 and 3 is limited, and I don't have a -STABLE box to test it myself. If anyone of you has any hints at what might be causing the build to fail, please let me know. If not, I'll send the authors a mail about it. Stefan