From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May  4 08:16:18 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 50C8716A4CE; Tue,  4 May 2004 08:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sandvine.com (sandvine.com [199.243.201.138])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A38D543D39; Tue,  4 May 2004 08:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from don@sandvine.com)
Received: by mail.sandvine.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
	id <HVCVTRHH>; Tue, 4 May 2004 11:16:14 -0400
Message-ID: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C85337045D8C4E@mail.sandvine.com>
From: Don Bowman <don@sandvine.com>
To: 'Scott Long' <scottl@freebsd.org>, Don Bowman <don@sandvine.com>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 11:16:12 -0400 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ASR driver update
X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: SCSI subsystem <freebsd-scsi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-scsi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 15:16:18 -0000

From: Scott Long [mailto:scottl@freebsd.org]
> Sent: May 4, 2004 10:24 AM
> To: Don Bowman
> Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASR driver update
> 
> 
> Thanks for the report.  This is fixed in rev 1.58 of asr.c.  I'm not
> sure why I didn't see this before.  Btw, do you by chance have a
> 2005/2015 SO-DIMM form-factor card?  I'm having trouble with mine and
> can't figure out if it's because the card is from a very early
> pre-production sample.
> 

The test I did was on the 2010s, PCI form-factor.
I do have 4 systems with the so-dimm 2015 card, but they're
a little harder for me to get @.

--don