From owner-freebsd-smp Fri Dec 8 13:21:37 2000 From owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 8 13:21:36 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from berserker.bsdi.com (berserker.twistedbit.com [199.79.183.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9CF37B400; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 13:21:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from berserker.bsdi.com (cp@localhost.bsdi.com [127.0.0.1]) by berserker.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id eB8LLSQ07456; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:21:28 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from cp@berserker.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200012082121.eB8LLSQ07456@berserker.bsdi.com> To: Mike Smith Cc: smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Netgraph and SMP In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 07 Dec 2000 21:42:31 PST." <200012080542.eB85gVN00523@mass.osd.bsdi.com> From: Chuck Paterson Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 14:21:28 -0700 Sender: cp@berserker.bsdi.com Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org For uses such as barriers for loading and unloading it is possible to have the counters and entry barriers all PCPU. You can then use more complex mechanisms to set the low level barrier and interrogate the counters. Terry ->>may<<- view this as another way of doing what he is suggesting. Chuck To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message