From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 27 02:10:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C8B37B401; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 02:10:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay1.cris.net (relay1.cris.net [212.110.128.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF29443FD7; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 02:10:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phantom@phantom.cris.net) Received: from phantom.cris.net (root@phantom.cris.net [212.110.130.74]) by relay1.cris.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h5RCE3np000446; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:14:04 GMT Received: (from phantom@localhost) by phantom.cris.net (8.12.6/8.12.2) id h5R9Hc4N028948; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:17:38 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from phantom) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:17:38 +0300 From: Alexey Zelkin To: deischen@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030627121738.A28850@phantom.cris.net> References: <20030627005225.A25700@phantom.cris.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from eischen@vigrid.com on Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 08:48:21PM -0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE i386 cc: threads@freebsd.org cc: David Xu Subject: Re: libkse & jdk14: signals(?) breakage X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 09:10:21 -0000 hi, On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 08:48:21PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > > > > Looks like signals are still not really working in libkse. > > > > > > > > > > David Xu is revamping signal handling (it also involves > > > > > some kernel changes). Very alpha patches are at: > > > > > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/kse_sig/ > > > > > > > > > > They are not yet completely working, but might help. > > > > > > > > Cool! It really helped. At least visible behaviour is same to libc_r. > > > > > > > > > > Your test is appreciated. I have updated the patches again, > > > they have past signal test suites included in libpthread. > > > Can you test these new patches again ? > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/kse_sig/kern.diff > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/kse_sig/libpthread.tgz > > > > It just works. Comparing to first signal patches it behaves even > > better. I did not see any random process lockups. Build & all TCK's > > VM tests passed. > > Wow, that's great news. Do you have an SMP system to try the > TCK tests on? Libpthread will automatically create as many > KSEs as you have CPUs. Unfortunatelly no :-( There're a lot of problems with customs in my country with receiving "free" computers and therefore I did not posted entry to wishlist. > Do you have any performance benchmarks so we can compare > against libc_r (or even libthr)? Not yet. Functional changes have more priority for me than benchmarking, sorry. libkse&libthr issues were "maybe need to be fixed" issues :-) > BTW, thanks for taking the time to run these tests :-)