From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun 11 16:03:43 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB37016A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:03:43 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ip192.186.dsl-acs2.seawa0.iinet.com
	[209.20.186.192])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B5843D45
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:03:43 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from randy@psg.com)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ran.psg.com.psg.com)
	by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD)
	id 1BYoUz-00051U-Q6; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 09:03:21 -0700
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16585.55241.116494.82556@ran.psg.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 09:03:21 -0700
To: Gordon Bergling <gbergling@0xfce3.net>
References: <16585.53262.981985.781956@ran.psg.com>
	<20040611154530.GA2049@nemesis.md.0xfce3.net>
	<16585.54319.939031.317044@ran.psg.com>
	<20040611155840.GA2335@nemesis.md.0xfce3.net>
cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: networking fubar
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:03:44 -0000

>> as luigi pointed out privately, there is a new ipfw and i
>> was running a kernel without the matching installworld.
>> 
>> now the question is how safe is it to run an installworld
>> using yesterday's (or today's) cvsup?  yes, i know the
>> answer is 42:-).
> 
> if you have newer sources as your last build I would
> recommend to 'make world' again. If you have tried to boot an
> old kernel?

i just cvsupped and am building kernel and world.  so that i
can have the latest versions when i whine:-).

> you maybe uncomment ipfw in your kernel-config.

that is my normal.  but i suspect you meant the opposite,
comment it out in kernel so i could [un]load dynamically,
yes?

randy