From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 28 07:15:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB1916A417 for ; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 07:15:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidschulz@tca-cable-connector.com) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5BE43D45 for ; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 07:15:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davidschulz@tca-cable-connector.com) Received: from [218.16.58.208] (helo=munin.tcaportal.com) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu6) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML29c-1GdiPN05Hb-00073F; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 09:15:10 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.tcaportal.com [127.0.0.1]) by munin.tcaportal.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 068CDA6C63 for ; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:15:41 +0800 (HKT) Received: from [10.0.1.102] (unknown [125.93.89.104]) by munin.tcaportal.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725ABA6C62 for ; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:15:40 +0800 (HKT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: FreeBSD Users Questions From: David Schulz Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:14:52 +0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:1405312fe15d228f5bad0d2fcbb6dc17 Subject: IPFW and PF X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 07:15:14 -0000 Hi all, IPFW seems to be the same IPFW that is used on MacOSX, so it seems to make sense to learn and lean on IPFW when using in a mixed Machine Environment. On the other side, many People seem to say PF is easier to manage once a setup gets complicated. As usual, both sides have their own valid points. My question though is not whether any of the two , IPFW of PF is better then the other, but which of the two do you use, and why? Thanks, David