From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Tue Jan 30 14:31:51 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42042ECDBFC; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:31:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED8A96F221; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:31:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id CDA22F1FE; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:31:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:31:50 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Adriaan de Groot Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r460298 - in head: devel/alabastra Message-ID: <20180130143150.GC31811@FreeBSD.org> References: <201801291256.w0TCu0Q5035974@repo.freebsd.org> <20180129150955.GA31811@FreeBSD.org> <3784572.LY0cXeFHoe@a-pc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3784572.LY0cXeFHoe@a-pc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:31:51 -0000 On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 08:53:21AM -0500, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Monday, January 29, 2018 10:09:56 AM EST Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > +++ head/devel/alabastra/Makefile Mon Jan 29 12:56:00 2018 > > > (r460298) @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ DISTNAME= Alabastra-${PORTVERSION} > > > MAINTAINER= ports@FreeBSD.org > > > COMMENT= C++ editor written with Qt 4 > > > > > > +DEPRECATED= Abandonware, not used in the ports tree > > > +EXPIRATION_DATE= 2018-03-01 > > > > This is a leaf port: the fact that it's not used in the ports tree is not > > relevant. It also fetches, builds, and runs fine. Why deprecate it? > > While it's all fun to have lots of things in the ports collection, you can > also ask yourself if a software product that last saw an update to 0.21 -- > last commits seem to be in 2009 on sourceforge SF.net is still the best distfile CDN, even in 2018. It sucks at other things, but I'd wish more projects were using it for hosting distfiles. > -- which relies on a toolkit that reached end-of-life in 2015, with plenty > of alternatives, and with no port maintainer, really should live on. Qt4 is still well in use by many software, it works nicely and I don't see any reason why it should be EoLed. > By all means, Mat, deprecate and move on. If someone actively cares, it > can be picked up again. Who's Mat? :-) r460298 was committed by bapt@. You would'be known this if your reply had retained enough of the original context. ./danfe