From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Sep 28 16:45:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F36A0BBEA for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 16:45:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@mips.inka.de) Received: from mail.inka.de (quechua.inka.de [IPv6:2001:7c0:407:1001:217:a4ff:fe3b:e77c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B4A01B61 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 16:45:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@mips.inka.de) Received: from mips.inka.de (news@[127.0.0.1]) by mail.inka.de with uucp (rmailwrap 0.5) id 1ZgbY1-0007oP-Fe; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 18:45:05 +0200 Received: from lorvorc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t8SGhXHp024536 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 18:43:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from news@lorvorc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from news@localhost) by lorvorc.mips.inka.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id t8SGhX09024535 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 18:43:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from news) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Christian Weisgerber Newsgroups: list.freebsd.questions Subject: Re: replacement for x11/xlogout? Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 16:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <22025.13047.708665.511050@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Trace: lorvorc.mips.inka.de 1443458613 24358 ::1 (28 Sep 2015 16:43:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@mips.inka.de User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 16:45:09 -0000 On 2015-09-28, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote: > I note in this morning's updates that xlogout has been deleted. > Is there an accepted replacement? It may be "cruft from 1989", > but it is _not_ useless. You could ask the maintainer to restore the port. Would have been simpler if you had spoken up during the three months grace period, though. When I stopped running xlogout maybe a decade ago, it felt like I was the last person on earth still using it. By 2015, I didn't expect anybody to be even aware of its existence any longer. > (Unless, of course, I find something else.) Something like xlogout can't be more than a few lines in Tcl/Tk, Perl/Tk, or the like. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de