From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Mar 2 11:27:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD1437C38F; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 11:27:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #3) id 12QbFi-0003iU-00; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 19:27:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA94371; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 19:27:13 GMT (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 19:27:13 +0000 (GMT) From: Jonathon McKitrick To: Brad Knowles Cc: Kris Kennaway , freebsd-chat Subject: Re: any news on w2k in the world? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Brad Knowles wrote: > Don't believe *ANYTHING* about *ANYTHING* of theirs, until and >unless you either have uncontestable first-hand knowledge yourself, >or you have a report from someone you personally know very well and >highly respect, and they have uncontestable first-hand knowledge. Of course, that means maybe we should doubt the original report about the 63,000 bugs. Where did that come from? I would love to see it first hand. And i certainly believe it is true. But then, i tend to be a bit gullible. So i should be equally wary of *both* statements. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message