From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 22 16:38:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF5D1065676 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038028FC20 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:38:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=NKL87DqwQSeuoJEJVsbaEO1bHZ6esBOjs89N3Is6mBw=; b=k0q+Ff9XT74QLNox/lgaQVW9DsDDRXTlfWzRjCe50YSHIJRrmbhlOKH5P0mUV1q5n+vtsOuLiX2RJZ4afAgFnRTfKV7ljToXdNxRZlWiwBQmY7Oye2olRmFRg06o+mKD; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Si6sN-000Haj-9T for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:38:27 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1340383106-94480-94479/5/46; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:38:26 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <201206221240.q5MCeVEF041711@mail.r-bonomi.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:38:26 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Why Clang X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:38:28 -0000 On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:25:55 -0500, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > examples? All test shows that gcc code is not only bad, but very good. > Why are you just saying things you know isn't true? Fast code is not guaranteed to be correct code.