Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:38:26 -0500
From:      Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
To:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Why Clang
Message-ID:  <op.wgbcicfu34t2sn@tech304>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206221624390.27991@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References:  <201206221240.q5MCeVEF041711@mail.r-bonomi.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206221624390.27991@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:25:55 -0500, Wojciech Puchar  
<wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:

> examples? All test shows that gcc code is not only bad, but very good.  
> Why are you just saying things you know isn't true?

Fast code is not guaranteed to be correct code.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.wgbcicfu34t2sn>