From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Fri Mar 22 16:08:50 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF753154A090 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 16:08:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.scott.phillips@intel.com) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "fmsmga102.fm.intel.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Organization Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61E6489237; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 16:08:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.scott.phillips@intel.com) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Mar 2019 09:07:37 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,256,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="285005973" Received: from dsp-dsk1.jf.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.54.70.10]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Mar 2019 09:07:37 -0700 From: D Scott Phillips To: araujo@freebsd.org Cc: "freebsd-virtualization\@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Updating uefi-edk2-bhyve In-Reply-To: References: <86muln68ld.fsf@intel.com> Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:07:37 -0700 Message-ID: <86mulmao52.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 61E6489237 X-Spamd-Bar: --------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of d.scott.phillips@intel.com designates 192.55.52.93 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=d.scott.phillips@intel.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-9.07 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:192.55.52.93/32]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; IP_SCORE(-1.80)[ipnet: 192.55.52.0/24(-4.96), asn: 4983(-3.96), country: US(-0.07)]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mga04.intel.com]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[intel.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.968,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:4983, ipnet:192.55.52.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI(-0.50)[93.52.55.192.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.9.3]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; WHITELIST_SPF_DKIM(-3.00)[intel.com:s:+] X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 16:08:51 -0000 Marcelo Araujo writes: > This is a fantastic news!!! > > I think after more tests done by the community, you should make a PR > to this repo: https://github.com/freebsd/uefi-edk2 and then I can > update the ports. Yep, that sounds like a good plan to me. Is there anything else I can be doing to get a "call for testing" out there, beyond this mail thread?