Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 01:43:47 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Paul FLOYD <pjfloyd@wanadoo.fr> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SIGBUS si_code 12 Message-ID: <20200514224347.GB46537@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <490544208.11847.1589489181927.JavaMail.www@wwinf1n11> References: <2102917207.11671.1589487524169.JavaMail.www@wwinf1n11> <490544208.11847.1589489181927.JavaMail.www@wwinf1n11>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 10:46:21PM +0200, Paul FLOYD wrote: > Hmm. Looking at the 12.1-stable siginfo manpage this seems to be fixed > > SIGBUS BUS_ADRALN invalid address alignment > BUS_ADRERR nonexistent physical address > BUS_OBJERR object-specific hardware error > BUS_OOMERR cannot alloc a page to map at fault > > with this being added to signal.h > > #define BUS_OOMERR 100 /* Non-standard: No memory. */ > > So presumably this will go away in 12.2. I do not understand what do you mean. What should go away ? Also, T_PAGEFLT value for si_code is a compat value that should be explicitly enabled by user, for compatibility with some really old binaries.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200514224347.GB46537>