From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 29 23:06:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79281106564A for ; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:06:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from if@xip.at) Received: from chile.gbit.at (ns1.xip.at [193.239.188.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9E68FC1A for ; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:06:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from if@xip.at) Received: (qmail 24371 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2008 01:06:14 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO filebunker.xip.at) (86.59.10.180) by chile.gbit.at with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 30 Jun 2008 01:06:14 +0200 Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 01:06:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Ingo Flaschberger To: Paul In-Reply-To: <4867A9A1.9070507@gtcomm.net> Message-ID: References: <4867420D.7090406@gtcomm.net> <4867A9A1.9070507@gtcomm.net> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Net Subject: Re: Freebsd IP Forwarding performance (question, and some info) [7-stable, current, em, smp] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:06:17 -0000 Dear Paul, does the em-task jump from cpu to cpu? (mp-systems are not really better for forwarding performance). try once with only 1 cpu. bye, Ingo