From owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 22 23:52:21 2012
Return-Path: <owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ctm-users@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8A0106564A
	for <ctm-users@freebsd.org>; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 23:52:21 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu)
Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu
	[128.206.184.213])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A638FC14
	for <ctm-users@freebsd.org>; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 23:52:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213])
	by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id
	q8MNqJJA032012; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 18:52:19 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu)
Message-ID: <505E4F33.9060006@missouri.edu>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 18:52:19 -0500
From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
	rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Klaus T. Aehlig" <aehlig@linta.de>
References: <4EF55B2B.9010700@missouri.edu>
	<20120921044729.GA47944@curry.linta.de>
	<505C6570.8060801@missouri.edu>
	<20120922094319.GA55036@curry.linta.de>
In-Reply-To: <20120922094319.GA55036@curry.linta.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "ctm-users@freebsd.org" <ctm-users@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: svn-cur
X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CTM User discussions <ctm-users.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/ctm-users>,
	<mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/ctm-users>
List-Post: <mailto:ctm-users@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/ctm-users>,
	<mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 23:52:21 -0000

On 09/22/2012 04:43 AM, Klaus T. Aehlig wrote:
>
> Dear Stephen,
>
>> Can you think of a way that ctm_rmail would work in both instances
>> (check both for 4 and 5 digit numbers, and check gz and xz)?  I think
>> that is what is needed if the tool is to be universal.
>
> yes, you're right. One should take care of all cases. See a new version of
> the patch attached.
>
> Best,
> Klaus
>


Do you mind if I put your patch on the CTM ftp sites?  I'll attribute it 
to you.

I should add, I haven't tested them myself, but I trust that you did a 
good job.  I don't use ctm_ramil myself.

The only change I will make is to the path names in the first two lines 
patch, so that it can be applied the same way as my patches.