From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 21 22:30:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8135B16A4CF; Sun, 21 Dec 2003 22:30:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D8C43D1F; Sun, 21 Dec 2003 22:30:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF141FF9A6; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 07:30:08 +0100 (CET) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id B2C241FF9A8; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 07:30:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 9A556154D8; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 06:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEBA1538F; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 06:28:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 06:28:15 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: "Crist J. Clark" In-Reply-To: <20031222041801.GA18856@blossom.cjclark.org> Message-ID: References: <20031219064932.GA94971@blossom.cjclark.org> <20031219143232.GA91798@numenor.net> <20031222041801.GA18856@blossom.cjclark.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Possible IPsec Trouble in 5.2RC? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 06:30:11 -0000 On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Crist J. Clark wrote: Hi, > > > I think the problem is that the IKE traffic, 500/udp, is not bypassing > > > the IPsec processing like it should. > > > > That's what looked like was going on in my setup as well. > > A few others have seen the same problems with KAME IPsec in 5.2RC. One > person mentioned that the FAST_IPSEC implementation does not share the > bug. I switched over and things work fine with the same racoon > executable and configuration. This does look like a bug in the FreeBSD > KAME IPsec. yes it is. I have reduced crashes here but have been away the whole sunday and thus have not yet finished my patching. I have not been able to test the BYPASS problem up to now. This had been the last uptime I could reach here: 5:48AM up 1 day, 1 min, 2 users, load averages: 0.02, 0.02, 0.00 After that some dynamic IPs changed including one on my ipsec interface and then it crashed. I already know the problem for that one. So if you might wait another few days I will hopefully be able to come up with a patch that fixes all the 0xdeadc0de access I am seeing here. -- Greetings Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT 56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/