From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jul 15 13: 0:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5486837B400 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:00:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F9C43E84 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:00:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g6FK0TRC084101; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:00:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g6FK0Tjt084098; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:00:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:00:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200207152000.g6FK0Tjt084098@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Robert Drehmel Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bug in awk implementation? In-Reply-To: <20020715214709.A12624@alpha.develop.ferrari.net> References: <20020715173747.A11802@alpha.develop.ferrari.net> <1026759240.7028.1.camel@hilfy.ece.cmu.edu> <20020715214709.A12624@alpha.develop.ferrari.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < said: > You are right. However, I still consider it a bug. :-) The standard says that the behavior is ``undefined''. That means that you computer is allowed to turn into a frog. Actually doing something useful is also permitted. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message