From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 17 20:19:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FD637B401 for ; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 20:19:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from praetor.linc-it.com (hardtime.linuxman.net [66.147.26.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9480C43FA3 for ; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 20:19:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mortis.over-yonder.net (adsl-19-135-74.jan.bellsouth.net [68.19.135.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by praetor.linc-it.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74D1152A5; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 22:19:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: by mortis.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 9614520F03; Sun, 17 Aug 2003 22:19:45 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 22:19:45 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Bill Moran Message-ID: <20030818031945.GB65803@over-yonder.net> References: <20030817102318.69e094fc.aelfgar@aelfgar.com> <3F3FCFB2.3050900@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F3FCFB2.3050900@potentialtech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i-fullermd.1 X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD cc: Mike Atamas cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slow Boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 03:19:50 -0000 On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 02:55:46PM -0400 I heard the voice of Bill Moran, and lo! it spake thus: > > My best guess is that the chipset responds slowly to probes, thus it > takes a while to get the list of devices from it. However, I've never > looked into it any more than that. I've always presumed it to be a question of timing out probes to the drives; it only ever happens on IDE controllers with no devices attached to 'em. I habitually just disable the controller channels that are empty (or, in the case of my SCSI systems, just yank ATA support altogether). -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ "The only reason I'm burning my candle at both ends, is because I haven't figured out how to light the middle yet"