Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:27:06 +0400 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: johan Hendriks <joh.hendriks@gmail.com>, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>, Simon <simon@optinet.com> Subject: Re: 4.x era Message-ID: <20110912072706.GA13360@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonV7EAN1qZut90p_7VnU_upDGv-igHyk=mowb0K2veNAw@mail.gmail.com> References: <4E6C829A.2080007@gmail.com> <20110911161228.EE0F5106564A@hub.freebsd.org> <CAJ-VmonV7EAN1qZut90p_7VnU_upDGv-igHyk=mowb0K2veNAw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:56:53AM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I've heard this many times, and here's my (paraphrased) stock response: > > People remember FreeBSD 4.x fondly. They likely don't remember 3.x > fondly. They remember 2.x fondly - because it was rock stable for a > lot of users. Then 3.x came along, with (new!) softupdates, and VM Forget about hard rock stable 1.1.5.1!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110912072706.GA13360>