From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 20 22:46:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6823216A402 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:46:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from zeus.int.dfwlp.com (zeus.dfwlp.com [208.11.134.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D4643D48 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:46:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) Received: from hera.int.dfwlp.com (hera.int.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by zeus.int.dfwlp.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3KMkJIp082352 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:46:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jhorne@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:46:18 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <1053.204.250.3.175.1145546659.squirrel@mail.dfwlp.com> <20060420184319.M72882@tripel.monochrome.org> In-Reply-To: <20060420184319.M72882@tripel.monochrome.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604201746.19142.jhorne@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on zeus.int.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: how to eliminate an unused interface? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:46:21 -0000 On Thursday 20 April 2006 17:44, Chris Hill wrote: > Could you not just do a > > # ifconfig fwe0 down > > ? > > Just a thought. Maybe you've already tried this, but nobody else has > suggested it. > > HTH. > > -- > Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org > ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] actually i did try that, but iftop still bound to it on start. oh well, a security advisory came out yesterday anyway, thus we're all due for a kernel compile as it is. ill just comment out the fwe0 and call it even. thanks all, jonathan