From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May  1 18:54:03 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: net@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B39F106566C;
	Tue,  1 May 2012 18:54:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from emaste@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFAE8FC12;
	Tue,  1 May 2012 18:54:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q41Is2Mx078454;
	Tue, 1 May 2012 18:54:02 GMT
	(envelope-from emaste@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from emaste@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q41Is2rs078450;
	Tue, 1 May 2012 18:54:02 GMT (envelope-from emaste)
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 18:54:02 GMT
Message-Id: <201205011854.q41Is2rs078450@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: emaste@FreeBSD.org, jfv@FreeBSD.org, net@FreeBSD.org
From: emaste@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/142518: [em] [lagg] Problem on 8.0-STABLE with em and lagg
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 18:54:03 -0000

Synopsis: [em] [lagg] Problem on 8.0-STABLE with em and lagg

Responsible-Changed-From-To: jfv->net
Responsible-Changed-By: emaste
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue May 1 18:53:35 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
It sounds like this is a problem with lagg(4) not em(4) and so shouldn't
be assigned to jfv.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=142518