From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 8 01:49:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF97F106564A for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 01:49:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fluffy@ael.ru) Received: from ns.ael.RU (ns.ael.ru [62.76.207.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE9B8FC13 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 01:49:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fluffy@ael.ru) Received: from neko.fluffy.khv.ru (neko.local.ael [192.168.7.162]) by ns.ael.RU (8.14.2/8.14.2/Fluffy/5.2) with ESMTP id m881UMDo078363; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 12:30:23 +1100 (VLAST) (envelope-from fluffy@ael.ru) From: Dima Panov To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 12:30:06 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <833002.54826.qm@web51109.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <1d3ed48c0809071713hece1847x2980e88d0e9fb54d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1d3ed48c0809071713hece1847x2980e88d0e9fb54d@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: (Zs+'ncTcchkOX|~t6{?Iii=O!G#WEK!+OD0|-F=i%1pvP5V_Sz4PaJC8o)=?utf-8?q?MiSnH/JMJFy=0A=09oBN-My?=, v":S7, (=?utf-8?q?mmkPm=27U=7BMgT+eM=2EBd=5Cp/P!dr=5DhOTXqpse21O!=25Ct=60SE=2EOodq?= =?utf-8?q?=5Dry=5E=23kU=5E=0A=09-?=GT.[8D}i$6P>=" =?utf-8?q?=23=0A=09*J+4d=7E?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200809081230.08366.fluffy@ael.ru> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (ns.ael.RU [192.168.1.1]); Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:30:26 +1100 (VLAST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.4 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ns.ael.RU Cc: Dino Vliet , Kevin Downey Subject: Re: libjvm.so not found on amd64 system with freebsd 7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:49:59 -0000 On 8 September 2008, Kevin Downey wrote: > > [root@dual /usr/ports/math]# ldd > > /usr/local/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libjava.so > > /usr/local/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libjava.so: > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libjava.so: > > Unexpected inconsistency: dependency libjvm.so not found > > /usr/local/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libjava.so: exit status 1 > I wonder if this is related to the dual core + procfs java issues: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java/2008-March/007346.html > > I forget exactly, but when java sees /proc it tries to use some > special file /proc/curfile or something like that, which, uh, on dual > core doesn't work reliably. Not only dualcore, but if jdk/jre placed on nullfs/unionfs. Seems to be affected any PSEUDOFS-based filesystems and broken procfs realization (any binary executed from pseudo-filesystem have broken info in their details, shows only PID info; cmdline, file symlink, status and other resources is unavailable). May be affected if /usr/local is mount-point to another physical partition. -- Дмитрий А. Панов Администратор ЛВС Государственная Академия Экономики и Права Хабаровск, Россия