Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 17:26:20 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> Cc: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/167346: [PATCH] editors/libreoffice: optionize pgsql Message-ID: <20120517152620.GH65751@azathoth.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120517133628.GF2987@hades.panopticon> References: <201205062345.q46NjXdu001189@freefall.freebsd.org> <20120517133628.GF2987@hades.panopticon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--r5lq+205vWdkqwtk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 05:36:28PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > * bapt@FreeBSD.org (bapt@FreeBSD.org) wrote: >=20 > > Synopsis: [PATCH] editors/libreoffice: optionize pgsql > >=20 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > > State-Changed-By: bapt > > State-Changed-When: Sun May 6 23:45:33 UTC 2012 > > State-Changed-Why:=20 > > Committed, with minor changes, the option is default on to avoid a port > > revision bump. Thanks! >=20 > Please consider changing it back to off with the next update. I > hardly see how/why a common office installation could/should use > (postgre)sql. >=20 That is what I'm considering regards, Bapt --r5lq+205vWdkqwtk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+1GJwACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwZcQCfUTRu9LKyvFjnT3V3htrN587J /BEAoLG8nLr1P/aVrQpXCcL4RswofhOj =hcIw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r5lq+205vWdkqwtk--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120517152620.GH65751>