From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Sep 9 16:11:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from pop3-3.enteract.com (pop3-3.enteract.com [207.229.143.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A61215C9C for ; Thu, 9 Sep 1999 16:10:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dscheidt@enteract.com) Received: (qmail 34645 invoked from network); 9 Sep 1999 23:10:28 -0000 Received: from shell-1.enteract.com (dscheidt@207.229.143.40) by pop3-3.enteract.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 1999 23:10:28 -0000 Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 18:10:28 -0500 (CDT) From: David Scheidt To: Matthew Hunt Cc: Stewart MacLund , Brett Taylor , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HUrm... Odd "gmake" error... In-Reply-To: <19990909155133.A41050@wopr.caltech.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Matthew Hunt wrote: > On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 06:46:41PM -0400, Stewart MacLund wrote: > > > And, i thought gmake was a good drop in replacement for make? No? Odd. > > Again, it has always worked before. > > gmake is simply not at all a replacement for make (nor the other > way around). If gmake ever worked in our tree before, that was a > coincidence. I'd call it an act of God, myself. gmake is a wonderful example of GNU feeping creaturism, and being different just for the sake of being GNU. David > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message