From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 13 18:40:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A3816A401 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:40:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18EC13C471 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:40:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB401A3C1A; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:40:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8F13753588; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:40:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:40:21 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Maho NAKATA Message-ID: <20070213184021.GA67445@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <45D18098.3070608@gmail.com> <20070213.213342.74679737.chat95@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070213.213342.74679737.chat95@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: 2.1 on ftp.freebsd.org? X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:40:23 -0000 On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:33:42PM +0900, Maho NAKATA wrote: > From: Lars Stokholm > Subject: 2.1 on ftp.freebsd.org? > Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:10:48 +0100 > > > If I'm not wrong, some weeks ago OOo 2.1 could be found here: > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/editors/ > > > > Why was it removed? Or if it was never there, why is that? > > Kris, do you know why builds failed on pointyhat? > It seems resource is exhausted :( The build is near the end... > > log is something like that: Yes, it took more than 3 days to build (the cutoff) and failed twice, i.e. 6 days was spent trying to build this port. Kris