From owner-freebsd-mobile  Thu Mar 23  0:54:41 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.79.126])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C3C37B60A
	for <freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 00:54:36 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nate@yogotech.com)
Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.79.115])
	by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA17409;
	Thu, 23 Mar 2000 01:54:34 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com)
Received: (from nate@localhost)
	by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA01362;
	Thu, 23 Mar 2000 01:54:34 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from nate)
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 01:54:34 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <200003230854.BAA01362@nomad.yogotech.com>
From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Robert Bowen <robert@braingarage.com>
Cc: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: polling vs irq for pcic
In-Reply-To: <38D9DA60.AB99C8B3@braingarage.com>
References: <200003230813.AAA02526@smartie.braingarage.com>
	<200003230831.BAA01265@nomad.yogotech.com>
	<38D9DA60.AB99C8B3@braingarage.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid
Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams)
Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> That makes it much clearer. What else could I try to get it to use an irq
> instead?

Don't know.  Do you really need one?


Nate


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message