Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 15:57:36 -0600 From: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> To: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: toolchain@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [releng_10 tinderbox] failure on arm/arm Message-ID: <1395611856.81853.54.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> In-Reply-To: <BDDEA1DC-2D74-4E2F-9D8E-1ACBB58DC73E@FreeBSD.org> References: <201403231522.s2NFM5Kc019213@worker01.tb.des.no> <8EA3BF27-225E-4818-8983-8793FCDF08D9@bsdimp.com> <BDDEA1DC-2D74-4E2F-9D8E-1ACBB58DC73E@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2014-03-23 at 22:31 +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 23 Mar 2014, at 17:59, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > > About the time clang was MFC=A2d, this started appearing. It has been= several days now. > >=20 > > Did the clang MFC botch something? Was the timing just a coincidence? >=20 > I hope the latter, but I didn't investigate yet. I do know that I ran = a > make universe before the clang 3.4 merge, and that worked just fine. >=20 > That said, at first glance this looks like some sort of scripting > problem? Does anybody know off the top of their heads where ARM_NARCH > and ARM_NMMUS are coming from? >=20 > -Dimitry >=20 from sys/arm/include/cpuconf.h. iirc, they use some compiler predefined macros. -- Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1395611856.81853.54.camel>