From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 25 21:45:25 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B35BE16A4CE; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:45:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1AEF243D70; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:45:25 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mark@grondar.org)
Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i7PLjOt4029079;	Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:45:24 +0100 (BST)
	(envelope-from mark@grondar.org)
Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)i7PLjNep029078;
	Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:45:23 +0100 (BST)
	(envelope-from mark@grondar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to
	mark@grondar.org using -f
Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])i7PLhH8M025604;
	Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:43:17 +0100 (BST)
	(envelope-from mark@grondar.org)
Message-Id: <200408252143.i7PLhH8M025604@grimreaper.grondar.org>
To: Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.ORG>
From: Mark Murray <markm@FreeBSD.ORG>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:39:13 -0000."
             <200408251939.i7PJdDCJ081125@repoman.freebsd.org> 
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:43:17 +0100
Sender: mark@grondar.org
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING 
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:45:25 -0000

Warner Losh writes:
>   # is preseedrandom still necessary?

It doesn't hurt, and its probablty best to keep it for now until
the entropy startup has been properly audited.

M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH