Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 10:13:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: confusion about nfsm_srvmtofh bad behavior? Message-ID: <199908021713.KAA14239@apollo.backplane.com> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990802113034.20420m-100000@cygnus.rush.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:The whole file needs some **** documentation. :)
:I stared at that for so long wondering why the heck it was doing that.
NFS is the worst-documented code in the kernel, VFS is second-worst.
Without commit privs, documenting existing code eats too much of my time
I'm afraid. With commit privs I tended to document as I went.
:Is there a chance you could give this some of your famous regression
:testing?
:...
:http://big.endian.org/~bright/freebsd/patches/nfsm_subs.diff
Lemme look at the patch.... hmm. The patch looks reasonable, I will
test it as soon as I finish running the buildworld test on localhost
NFS mounts.
My source tree is getting a little messy. We have madvise() broken open
too. Hopefully we will be able to get that committed soon.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
:i'd rather get rid of the extra copying going on and since
:previously it was filled with garbage from the rest of the RPC
:structure i don't think it's nessesary.
:
:-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@rush.net|bright@wintelcom.net]
:systems administrator and programmer
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908021713.KAA14239>