From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Apr 19 4:24:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5DB137B404; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 04:24:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.11.6/8.11.2) id g3JBOHS90227; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 14:24:17 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 14:24:17 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: "David O'Brien" Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <20020419112417.GA86103@sunbay.com> References: <200204190740.g3J7ea347781@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020419010057.A4986@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020419082123.GJ53150@sunbay.com> <20020419021641.A6998@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020419021641.A6998@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 02:16:41AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 11:21:23AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > I thought you said ${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.port.mk could included bsd.own.= mk > > > directly. >=20 > You did not answer my question. > Also by putting more things in share/mk/bsd.port.mk the path is opened to > migrate more and more things back to share/mk/bsd.port.mk. >=20 Yes, there's nothing wrong if ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk includes . But Bill Fenner suggested that I put this into src/share/mk/bsd.port.mk so that version in ports/Mk can be kept FreeBSD-version independent and currently we only _need_ to include bsd.own.mk for HEAD. > One of the biggest problems with share/mk/bsd.port.mk was that many users > did not want to CVSup src/ or build world. The just wanted to cvsup > ports. You have added a single line to share/mk/bsd.port.mk; so I guess > that won't cause too much problems. But I hope the urge to add stuff to > share/mk/bsd.port.mk can be strongly contained in the future. >=20 That sounds reasonable at a glance, but wait! How it is supposed to work if ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk still depends on bsd.own.mk from src/share/mk? > Too bad there is not a /usr/ports/UPDATING to let people know they need > to install a new share/mk/bsd.port.mk. >=20 Having such file would be great. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8v/5hUkv4P6juNwoRAuNSAJ9K0XsDFwSlFXtYs5recEeJu/r2qgCggZQN IuW70vah72JGfxT9RdjSDlA= =OYIL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message