From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 23 23:30:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD6F37B401 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 23:30:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net (heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D6643FA3 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 23:30:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from user-38ldt1t.dialup.mindspring.com ([209.86.244.61] helo=mindspring.com) by heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19UhK7-0004I0-00; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 23:30:35 -0700 Message-ID: <3EF7EFCB.4A4BACB8@mindspring.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 23:29:31 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Reilly References: <1056423804.48266.54.camel@gurney.reilly.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a42b293040c93906add70b55efaa797afc667c3043c0873f7e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org cc: Mohammad Nayyer Zubair Subject: Re: ideas about a unioning file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 06:30:39 -0000 Andrew Reilly wrote: > On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 08:15, Mohammad Nayyer Zubair wrote: > > Has anyone extensively used freebsd unionfs? From a system/network > > administrator or from a kernel developer standpoint, what do you like > > about it and what you dont like about it? > > I'm using unionfs thusly: > > # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump > /dev/vinum/vinum0 /usr ufs rw,union 0 > 2 Actually, this is the union mount option, which isn't the same thing as unionfs. > > Out of the previous efforts at a unioning file system like the Sun's TFS, > > 3DFS, Plan 9 and FreeBSD unionfs itself, which fs do you think came close > > to an ideal unioning file system? > > What's wrong with the one that we have? It's a mount option, not a file system. 8-). -- Terry