From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug 27 17:51:23 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51A916A4E1;
	Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:51:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [194.58.105.35])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2F743D64;
	Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:51:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD))
	id 1GHOGP-0002I3-D2; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:17:37 +0400
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:17:37 +0400
From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To: Alexander Kabaev <kan@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20060827171737.GA85840%slw@zxy.spb.ru>
References: <20060826212120.GA66604@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<20060826223608.GA5436@hub.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060826223608.GA5436@hub.freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.4.6 update complete
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:51:24 -0000

On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 10:36:08PM +0000, Alexander Kabaev wrote:

> All is clear. This update should be pretty uneventful and nothing should
> break because of it. I am very interested in being notified of anything
> that contradicts with an above statement.

buildkernel break with many "warning: 'XXX' might be used
uninitialized in this function"