From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Oct 18 10:08:09 1995
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id KAA12477
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 18 Oct 1995 10:08:09 -0700
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA12463
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Oct 1995 10:08:04 -0700
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id DAA05231; Thu, 19 Oct 1995 03:03:59 +1000
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1995 03:03:59 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199510181703.DAA05231@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: bde@zeta.org.au, wollman@lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Errors building some LKMs in -current
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>I chose `foo_mod' because it was unlikely to conflict with anything
>that already existed in the code.  `foo_init' is simply the wrong
>name, because these are /not/ ``initialization'' functions; they are
>initialization-status-teardown functions.

How about `foo_dispatch'.  The examples in /usr/src/lkm/*.c are all
named `foo_init' but they just invoke the DISPATCH() macro.

Bruce