From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Jun 22  1:32: 4 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC3F14D4F
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 01:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com)
	by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1)
	id 10wLxy-000D7j-00; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 10:31:38 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: John Baldwin <jobaldwi@vt.edu>
Cc: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Inetd and wrapping. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 21 Jun 1999 17:47:10 -0400."
             <199906212147.RAA03166@smtp4.erols.com> 
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 10:31:38 +0200
Message-ID: <50450.930040298@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Mon, 21 Jun 1999 17:47:10 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:

> I suppose you could a field wrap/nowrap like the wait/nowait field..
> but then you'd be butchering the sacred cow of the inetd.conf
> format...

I don't see why people want to make inetd responsible for per-case
exclusions from the default wrapping behaviour -- that's what
hosts.allow was for.

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message