Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:58:26 +0000 From: Kris Maglione <bsdaemon@comcast.net> To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ath: a few questions Message-ID: <41EE9FC2.1080905@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <41ED4652.8040902@errno.com> References: <41ED1FD5.8090401@comcast.net> <20050118144209.GF3054@empiric.icir.org> <41ED3019.9020600@comcast.net> <41ED4652.8040902@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sam Leffler wrote: > kismet has been broken for a while. It used to work but something > broke it and I've had no time to dig (it's painful to debug as it's a > multi-process app written in C++ and makes heavy use of STL so > inspecting data structures is a pain). You didn't mention how sparsely commented it is (in a lot of places, anyway). There are whole blocks of code that I have to read over a few times just to figure out what their point is, not to mention data structures and variables being declared with no comments whatsoever on what they do, and no comments on what's being done where they're used. Not that it's uncommon, but it makes things difficult.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41EE9FC2.1080905>